Miscellaneous

Why was the endosymbiotic theory rejected?

Why was the endosymbiotic theory rejected?

Many scientists were skeptical of the endosymbiotic hypothesis because it didn’t seem to fit into the theory of evolution as it was understood then. However, the new hypothesis proposed big evolutionary advances through symbiosis — not slow and steady change through tiny mutations.

What evidence does not support the endosymbiotic theory?

“The exterior structure similar to bacterial cell walls” IS NOT an evidence in favour of the endosymbiotic theory. Both mitochondria and chloroplasts are double membrane bound.

Is endosymbiotic theory wrong?

These theories were initially dismissed on the assumption that they did not contain DNA. This was proven false in the 1960s, leading Hans Ris to resurrect the idea. The theory of endosymbiosis is a concept that mitochondria and chloroplasts are the result of numerous decades of evolution.

READ:   Can life exist in two dimensions?

What is the strongest argument that supports the endosymbiotic theory?

There is broad evidence to show that mitochondria and plastids arose from bacteria and one of the strongest arguments to support the endosymbiotic theory is that both mitochondria and plastids contain DNA that is different from that of the cell nucleus and that they have their own protein biosynthesis machinery.

Who was responsible for the endosymbiotic theory?

Lynn Margulis
The idea that the eukaryotic cell is a group of microorganisms was first suggested in the 1920s by the American biologist Ivan Wallin. The endosymbiont theory of mitochondria and chloroplasts was proposed by Lynn Margulis of the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Which of the following is evidence to support the endosymbiotic theory?

Which of the following is evidence to support the endosymbiotic theory? Prokaryotes have the same number and types of enzymes as eukaryotes. Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA, which is similar to prokaryotic DNA. All eukaryotic cells have a double-layered membran composed of phosplipids and proteins.

READ:   How often do exes reconcile?

What are the 3 pieces of evidence that support the endosymbiotic theory?

Numerous lines of evidence exist, including that mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own circular DNA (prokaryotes also have circular DNA), mitochondria and chloroplasts have a double membrane (the inner membrane would have initially been the ingested prokaryote’s single membrane, and the outer membrane initially …

Why is the endosymbiotic theory a theory?

The endosymbiotic theory states that some of the organelles in today’s eukaryotic cells were once prokaryotic microbes. They eventually lost their cell wall and much of their DNA because they were not of benefit within the host cell. Mitochondria and chloroplasts cannot grow outside their host cell.

How did she use evidence which opposed a hypothesis to support her own hypothesis?

How did she use evidence which opposed a hypothesis to support her own hypothesis? She found no evidence to support the step-by-step evolution of mitochondria within cells. No cells have been seen with simple forms of mitochondria showing these steps.

READ:   Is 500px licensing worth it?

What are 4 pieces of evidence that support the endosymbiotic theory?

What is evidence for the endosymbiotic theory?