When can we say that violence is moral?

Three prominent views on the morality of violence are (1) the pacifist position, which states that violence is always immoral, and should never be used; (2) the utilitarian position, that means that violence can be used if it achieves a greater “good” for society; (3) a hybrid of these two views which both looks at …

Is violence immoral?

Violence is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding: it seeks to annihilate rather than convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love.

Can there be virtue in violence?

The virtuous person has the capacity for being violent when something has happened that merits it, and at least one thing that might merit it is someone attacking them. Being in a fight means that certain actions — in particular acts of retaliatory violence — may be justified.

What is justified violence?

A State may be justified to respond violently to a violent attack – be it physical, psychological, or verbal violence to be at stake. Equally, according to some, it may be justifiable to respond with physical violence to some legal or institutional violence.

What is fear in human act?

Fear: is a negative human emotion in which an individual feels insecure and threatened by external events and also of his own actions. It also arises when person commits some unrighteous acts. Ignorance is lack of knowledge or in philosophical sphere, lack of wisdom.

What drives a person to violence?

Conventionally, violence is understood to be often driven by negative emotions, such as anger or fear. For example, a person might become aggressive because they were enraged at another person, or they were afraid the other person might hurt them. So aggression can feel good.

What is ethical ignorance?

Ethical ignorance can be defined as an unspoken acceptance of falsehood for the sake of social stability or peace.

What is a psychological violence?

Any intentional conduct that seriously impairs another person’s psychological integrity through coercion or threats. Statistical definition: Psychological violence can take the form of, for example, coercion, defamation, verbal insult or harassment.

Does not justify the means?

But as young kids, we learned that the “end doesn’t justify the means.” In other words, a positive outcome isn’t, well, a good thing if the methods used were dishonest or harmful to others. On the contrary, cheating or avoiding hard classes might keep your GPA high, but using these means never justifies the end result.