Why did some leaders fear when the demand for the formation of states on language was raised what was its outcome?

When the demand for the formation of States on the basis of language was raised. Some national leaders feared that it would lead to the disintegration of the country. which means, It would divide the country into different parts and the country would lose its unity and strength.

Why were some of the leaders not willing to agree with the formation of linguistic states?

National leaders were opposed to the idea of linguistic State due to the reasons such as. India is a country with Unity in Diversity, as such demarcation of India based on linguistic province will demean the objective. We need to have one language across the country to be made national language in a unified form.

What was the fear in the minds of some national leaders in forming linguistic states in India was this fear valid if not explain why?

After India’s independence the main fear of forming linguistic state was that, it divides the country into various parts on the basis of language. After independence forming lingusitc straws was also a very important task for Indian democray. These lingusitc states are on the basis of language, geography, etc.

What was the fear in the minds of national leaders when states were divided on linguistic basis what was its result Class 10?

When the demand for the formation of states on the basis of language was raised some national leaders feared that it would lead to the disintegration of the country. But the experience has shown that the formation of linguistic states has actually made the country more united.

Why did some leaders fear?

Some national leaders feared that it would lead to the disintegration of the country. which means, It would divide the country into different parts and the country would lose its unity and strength.

What is not the part of language policy of the government of India?

The Constitution Of India did not provide any language with the status of the national language. As a precaution, the Constitution Of India has adopted steps to avoid the propagation of the imposition of Hindi to non-Hindi speaking regions.

Who were against the creation of linguistic states justify with reason?

Both Prime Minister Nehru and Deputy Prime Minister Vallabhbhai Patel were against the creation of linguistic states. Nehru clearly said that he had to check disruptionist tendencies caused due to partition and make the nation strong and united.

How many languages are spoken in India?

Press Trust of India More than 19,500 languages or dialects are spoken in India as mother tongues, according to the latest analysis of a census released this week. There are 121 languages which are spoken by 10,000 or more people in India, which has a population of 121 crore, it said.

Why were the linguistic states created explain?

Linguistic states were created to ensure that people who speak the same language lived in the same state. Some states were purposefully created to uphold the differences based on culture, ethnicity or geography. Example: Nagaland, Jharkhand, and Uttarakhand.

What are the benefits of the formation of linguistic states?

The linguistic states were created to ensure that the people who spoke the same language lived in the same state. The advantages are: (i) It has made the country more united. (ii) It has also made administration easier.

How was the challenge of language policy adopted by our country?

Challenge of language policy was adopted by the Indian federalism in the following way: (i) A second test for Indian federalism is the language policy. (ii) Our constitution did not give the status of national language to any one language. (vii) States too have their own official languages.

Why did India adopt the language policy while creating new states?

Ans. In 1947, the boundaries of several old States of India were changed in order to create new States. This was done to ensure that people who spoke the same language lived in the same State. Some States were created not on the basis of language but to recognize differences based on culture, ethnicity or geography.

Why did some leaders fear when the demand for States on language?

Some leaders fear when the demand for formation of states on language was raised because they believed that it would create disintegration in the country. They believed that it was segregation. (i) It made administration easier. (ii) It created integration. (iii) Boundaries were renewed to keep the people speaking the same language together.

Why did the central government resist linguistic states for some time?

Best answer (a) When the demand for the formation of the states on the basis of language was raised, some national leaders feared that it would lead to the disintegration of the country. That is why the central government resisted linguistic states for some time.

Does the formation of linguistic states make the country more United?

(c) But the experience has shown that the formation of linguistic states has actually made the country more united. It has also made the administration easier. Please log in or register to add a comment.

When did the Congress of Nations redistribute provinces on linguistic basis?

In 1927, the Congress again declared that it was committed to “the redistribution of provinces on a linguistic basis”, and reaffirmed its stance several times, including in the election manifesto of 1945-46.