Blog

Is 1700 a good Lichess?

Is 1700 a good Lichess?

Playing casually for only a year and being 1700 in Lichess is good enough. If you are aiming at becoming a professional or tournament player, there’s still some way to go and perhaps you could intensify your learning even more, with more chess books or perhaps a teacher or coach.

What is a good fide rating?

what is a good chess rating?

Category Rating range
Senior master 2400–2599
Master 2200–2399
Expert 2000–2199
Class A 1800–1999

Is 1800 Rapid lichess good?

If by solid you mean, what is considered, “Good”, on lichess, then anything over 1900 is great. 1800, good, but it’s not that impressive. No, 1800 is not solid. even 2000 is not solid in Lichess.

READ:   Does it take courage to walk away from a fight?

How good is 1800 on Lichess?

Generally online ratings on lichess or chess are considered to be approximately 200–300 more than FIDE (if you were FIDE registered). So you can expect yourself to be a Class D or category 4 player.

How good is 1500 Elo chess?

1500 on chess.com is indeed a good rating. Your USCF rating would be in the range of 1300 -1700 depends on how you play in the tournaments.

Is 1500 a good lichess rating?

1400 blitz is better than 44\% of all players on Lichess. 1500 is better than 53\% of all players. The median is around 1460. A rating in the range of 1400–1500 is dead average.

Is lichess better than chess com?

The software of lichess is also clean and bugfree, it does not lag, on the other hand chess com’s lag very much. The thing for which Chess.com – Play Chess Online – Free Games is better over lichess is its ‘lessons’ functions which help you practise and I prove your chess skill. So overall lichess is better.

READ:   Who came up with hours minutes and seconds?

Why don’t FIDE’s rating systems work for isolated players?

It turns out, players’ geographical isolation highlights an under-appreciated fact about FIDE’s rating system. The FIDE rating system doesn’t tell you how good you are; it tells you how good you are compared to other players. Thus the ratings of isolated groups of players are effectively unrelated.

How accurate are online ratings compared to FIDE ratings?

Online and FIDE ratings can’t be directly compared or converted with any real accuracy. They have a different pool of players and different constraints. I’d be surprised if the actual mathematical rating method was exactly the same.

Is there a correlation between Lichess Blitz and FIDE rating?

The correlation between chess.com and lichess blitz is slightly better. You can find all the equations in the link above, but since the original question was specifically about predicting FIDE rating from chess.com, I’ll also post that one here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5vDp-HmOM4