What should the U.S. do in the Arctic?

Any new U.S. Arctic security strategy should have three goals: deter military attacks against U.S. or allied territory originating from the Arctic, prevent China or Russia from weakening existing rules-based Arctic governance through coercion, and prevent regional hegemony by either China or Russia.

Why is Russia building up its military installations in the Arctic?

(CNN) Russia is amassing unprecedented military might in the Arctic and testing its newest weapons in a region freshly ice-free due to the climate emergency, in a bid to secure its northern coast and open up a key shipping route from Asia to Europe.

What the Blue Arctic means for the U.S. Pacific military presence?

Melting sea ice in the Arctic increases accessibility between the Atlantic and the Pacific Oceans. It opens shorter maritime trade routes by reducing travel time and mitigates a geographic disadvantage for the U.S. Navy, enabling rapid deployment to combine fleets in case of crisis or conflicts.

What does the US want from the Arctic?

The policy calls for the US to “assert a more active and influential national presence to protect its Arctic interests and project sea power throughout the region,” and to secure free passage of vessels through the Northwest Passage and the Northern Sea Route.

Why has the US been a reluctant Arctic nation?

transforming due to climate change, resource development, globalization, and geopolitical factors, the United States can no longer ignore the Arctic. characterized as the “reluctant” Arctic power.

What is Russia doing in the Arctic?

Russia’s growing attention to the Arctic can be seen both in concrete actions such as the building of various infrastructure in the region, such as building icebreakers, opening up oil and gas pipelines, developing the Arctic for tourism, encouraging international cooperation for Arctic development, in addition to …

Why is the Arctic important to Russia?

The Arctic has ample supplies of oil and gas, making it a strategic region not only for the Russian economy but also the commercial interests of key Kremlin powerbrokers who are close associates and members of Putin’s inner circle. The Arctic economic interests of the state and of the ruling elites are intertwined.

What is the issue in the Arctic?

Three main environmental issues are apparent in the Arctic: climate change, changes in biodiversity and the use of toxic chemicals.

Who has control of the Arctic?

Eight countries have territory within it: America (through Alaska), Canada, Denmark (by virtue of Greenland), Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia and Sweden.

What part of U.S. is in the Arctic Circle?

Alaska
The U.S. Arctic territory, defined as the region above the Arctic Circle (66.3 degrees North), is comprised of the northern parts of Alaska and parts of the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas.

Why are Arctic nations interested in expanding their seabed territory?

Some of these nations have claimed parts of the region to be their territory. Underlying the interests in the area are potentially vast oil, gas and other resources, as well as the opening up of lucrative passages for trade and economic activity. As a result, these nations have been vying for dominance in the Arctic.

Why does Russia want control of the Arctic?

The main goals of Russia in its Arctic policy are to utilize its natural resources, protect its ecosystems, use the seas as a transportation system in Russia’s interests, and ensure that it remains a zone of peace and cooperation.

How should NATO attack Russia during the Cold War?

During the Cold War, the Royal Navy deployed Invincible-class carriers for this same purpose. While, other NATO forces should target Russia’s naval bases, missile launchers and airfields.

Is Russia vulnerable to NATO’s maritime power?

“Russia is vulnerable to NATO’s fully mobilized maritime power,” Allport’s study concludes. The transatlantic alliance’s own campaign, based in and around Iceland, the United Kingdom, and Norway, should aim to secure sea lanes to ensure troops and supplies can safely cross the Atlantic from North America.

Is NATO powerless to combat the Russian interdiction campaign?

But as was the case a generation or two ago, NATO is hardly powerless to combat, and eventually defeat, the Russian interdiction campaign. “Russia is vulnerable to NATO’s fully mobilized maritime power,” Allport’s study concludes.

Is the Pentagon preparing for a potential war with Russia?

The U.S. Navy’s reestablishment of its 2nd Fleet, a regional force for the North Atlantic, signals that the Pentagon is serious about preparing for a potential war with Russia, Allport said separately from his report. The Navy had disestablished the 2nd Fleet in 2011 as a cost-saving measure. Three years later, Russia invaded Ukraine.