What if the US buys Greenland?

An acquisition of Greenland would give the United States permanent possession of an island that is crucial to its defense. The country would acquire vast amounts of natural resources—whether found or expected—including petroleum and rare minerals; the island has the largest deposits of rare earths outside China.

How do I email the White House?

Contacting the White House. Please send your comments to [email protected]. Due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White House cannot respond to every message.

Will the US ever purchase Greenland?

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken on Thursday confirmed that the United States was no longer interested in buying Greenland, scuttling for good a quixotic 2019 proposal by the Trump administration to annex the self-governing Danish territory.

What is the Presidential email address?

If you do not see text editing areas below, your browser does not support forms. In that case, send mail directly to [email protected] instead.

When did the United States offer to buy Greenland?

President Andrew Jackson’s administration (1829-1837) floated the idea of buying the island, as did an 1867 report by the U.S. State Department, the BBC said. President Harry Truman even offered Denmark $100 million for Greenland in 1946, though nothing came of the proposal.

Why invest in greengreenland?

Greenland’s growing strategic value is linked tightly to new North Atlantic shipping lanes opening up due to melting polar ice caps. Its largely ice-capped land mass is also rich in untapped natural resources.

Why is the United States military stationed in Greenland?

Greenland is also in an advantageous location for the U.S. armed forces. The U.S. and Greenland have had an agreement since World War II to house American military assets on the island.

Is Greenland essentially a large real estate deal?

It’s essentially a large real estate deal.” The art of the deal is to spot your adversary’s weakness. Trump said Greenland was costing Denmark about $700m (£575m) a year in subsidies. While he pointed out this drain on the public finances, it was clear he saw it as a bargaining chip that could be used to persuade Danish taxpayers.