Who Criticised Milgram experiment?

One of the most vocal of those critics is Australian author and psychologist Gina Perry, who documented her experience tracking down Milgram’s research participants in her 2013 book Behind the Shock Machine: The Untold Story of the Notorious Milgram Psychology Experiments.

What were the limitations of the Milgram experiment?

– Long-term psychological harm to participants – some participants reported psychological problems following the traumatic events of the study. There was also no period of debriefing following experiments, increasing the likelihood of psychological harm.

What is wrong with the Milgram experiment?

The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows: deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal. The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.

What was the problem with Milgram’s experiment on obedience quizlet?

The teacher has to decide between obeying the obvious authority of the experimenter or listening to his conscience that he is hurting the learner. What did Milgram and other psychologists predict? Criticisms were made that the experiment wasn’t carried out on ‘normal’ people.

Was Milgram’s study reliable?

Milgram’s procedure is very reliable because it can be replicated – between 1961-2 he carried out 19 Variations of his baseline study.

Is Milgram’s experiment reliable?

Which aspect of harm could it be argued was violated in Milgram’s shock study?

Ethical Issues. Deception – the participants actually believed they were shocking a real person and were unaware the learner was a confederate of Milgram’s. However, Milgram argued that “illusion is used when necessary in order to set the stage for the revelation of certain difficult-to-get-at-truths.”

What conclusions does Milgram draw from the results of the varied experiments?

What conclusions did Milgram draw? Social influence is strong and people will obey orders even when it causes them distress.

How does Milgram’s study lack validity?

Milgram’s study lacked ecological validity as it was carried out in an artificial laboratory environment; therefore, findings cannot be generalized to real life obedience such as in the Holocaust, as demand characteristics may have been the reasons for obedience, rather than the man in the white coat.

How did Milgram make the experiment as realistic as possible?

Milgram argued that they are justified as the study was about obedience so orders were necessary. Milgram pointed out that although the right to withdraw was made partially difficult, it was possible as 35\% of participants had chosen to withdraw.

Why would Milgram’s experiment not be allowed today?

At the time, the Milgram experiment ethics seemed reasonable, but by the stricter controls in modern psychology, this experiment would not be allowed today. Modern ethical standards assert that participants in any experiment must not be deceived, and that they must be made aware of any consequences.

What did the Milgram study conclude about our response to authority?

Social psychologist Stanley Milgram researched the effect of authority on obedience. He concluded people obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative–even when acting against their own better judgment and desires.