Which was better Panzer 4 or Sherman?

The German Panzer-kampf-wagen V (Panther) tank was superior to the American M4 Sherman in almost every respect, but it could not guarantee victory at every encounter. Its 75mm high-velocity weapon, while not as powerful as a Tiger’s 88mm, could easily penetrate a Sherman’s hull or turret at all battlefield distances.

Was the Sherman the best tank of ww2?

The M4 Sherman medium battle tank was one of the most iconic fighting vehicles of World War 2 and a defining image of the American Army in Europe. It was an excellent tank that excelled not only on the battlefield, but also along its whole chain of financing, production, and logistics.

Why was the Sherman so bad?

Because of their insufficient armor, the insides of Sherman tanks were prone to catching fire during combat. This problem was compounded when fires ignited shells and other munitions inside a tank. The Sherman M4 medium tank proved to be both a “death trap” for American soldiers and a poor defense against German tanks.

How bad is T-34?

It possessed many advanced design features for the time—and it could blow German Panzers to Hell. The T-34 had its problems—something we often forget when discussing a tank with a legendary reputation. The shortfalls included bad visibility for the crew and shoddy Soviet workmanship.

Why is the T-34 so effective?

The tank’s main advantage was its simple design which made it easy to mass produce and repair. The T-34 was also small and comparibaly light, while the tank’s water-cooled diesel engine minimized the danger of fire and increased the tank’s the radius of action.

Was the Sherman any good?

U.S. intelligence had assessed the Sherman as equal to the Panzer IV, the mainstay of the German tank force. America concluded the Sherman was good enough. Unfortunately, the U.S. had failed to accurately forecast production of newer, more powerful German designs such as the Panther and Tiger.

Was the Sherman the best tank?

The Sherman was an extremely good tank. It was excellent when it first came out, very reliable and not difficult to produce at all. Variants of the Shermans were used by first rate armies (especially the Israelis) until the 1980s.

What is the difference between the T-34 and the Sherman?

Both tanks had sloped frontal armour (glacis) of similar thickness. It is from ahead most tanks face the most threats. T-34 had sloped side armour as well, whilst Sherman had straight sides. Note that having sloped armour is no magic wand.

What were the disadvantages of the T-34?

The T-34 also had notoriously uncomfortable ergonomics and a cramped turret. The Sherman and Cromwell tanks were protected by up to three inches of armor, with lower degrees of protection on the sides and rear.

Is the M4 Sherman Firefly better than the T-34?

M4 has been on about even standing with Panzer IV while T-34 has been superior. T-34–85 and Sherman Firefly is more equal in combat effectiveness but T-34–85 is still slightly better. The only real advantage of Shermans lying in their radio-stations so unit cooperation has been superior.

What was the top speed of the Sherman tank?

The Sherman alone additionally mounted a heavy .50-caliber machine gun on the turret for air defense. The Sherman and T-34 could attain 28 and 32 miles per hour respectively, a very decent pace for tanks of the era.