How effective was the German flak in WW2?

As a result, huge numbers of shells were expended in the effort–shells that were not directed at Allied armies closing in on the Reich. Whatever the effectiveness of the expenditure of resources, the German Flak proved to be nightmare for Allied bomber crews. One reason for this was its unpredictability.

How strong was the German air defense in WW2?

Total antiaircraft artillery personnel strength, including staffs and administration, grew to over one million, with hardware that included 9,000 heavy guns, 30,000 light guns, and 15,000 heavy searchlights. The basic German air defense was called Flakartillerie, or flak, for short.

What happened to the Luftwaffe’s home defense in WW2?

As the effectiveness of the Luftwaffe’s fighter defensive against Allied bombers failed, flak forces began to shoulder a greater portion of the load as the main element of home air defense. German antiaircraft concentrations around key targets grew dramatically.

How effective were anti aircraft guns in WW1?

Light or medium antiaircraft guns were highly maneuverable and could engage a target almost immediately as it came within view and range. These guns relied on high rates and volumes of fire. For altitudes below 1,500 feet, they were exceedingly accurate.

Why didn’t Germany make anti-aircraft guns in WW2?

As Germany had been prohibited from producing large caliber weapons per the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, the FLAK anti-aircraft guns were actually developed by German weapons manufacturer Krupp and then built in partnership with the Swedish-based Bofors.

Were more Allied planes shot down by flak or fighter planes?

From what I’ve read, far more Allied planes were shot down by flak than by fighter planes. I also found this: The accuracy and effectiveness of FLAK or anti-aircraft artillery fire was derided at the start of the war but it gained a healthy respect as the war dragged on.