Which research method was used in the study on being sane in insane places?

The Rosenhan experiment
The Rosenhan experiment or Thud experiment was an experiment conducted to determine the validity of psychiatric diagnosis. The participants feigned hallucinations to enter psychiatric hospitals but acted normally afterwards.

Did Rosenhan conduct a follow up study?

Follow-up study After this original study was conducted, one hospital heard of the findings and challenged Rosenhan to send pseudopatients to their hospital with the belief that they would be able to spot the fakes from the genuine patients. In fact, Rosenhan had not sent any pseudopatients during this time.

What is a major concern with the Rosenhan study?

The most blatant problem with Rosenhan’s study was that his “pseudopatients” were not pseudopatients at all—they were real patients faking real disease. The fact that some patients fake mental illness and are able to deceive the doctors who examine them says nothing about the legitimacy of the illnesses themselves.

Why was Rosenhan’s study unethical?

There are significant ethical issues with the study as the hospital staff were deceived about the patients’ symptoms. However, Rosenhan did protect confidentiality – no staff or hospitals were named, thus minimising the risk of identification.

What was Rosenhan’s research method?

The Rosenhan experiment or Thud experiment was an experiment conducted to determine the reliability and validity of psychiatric diagnosis. The experimenters feigned hallucinations to enter psychiatric hospitals, and acted normally afterwards.

What was the independent variable in the Rosenhan experiment?

independent variable was the made up symptoms of the pseudo patients, and the dependent variable was the psychiatrists’ admission and diagnostic label of the pseudo patient.

What was Rosenhan’s hypothesis?

In a recent and widely publicized book, psychologist Lauren Slater reported an attempt to test David Rosenhan’s hypothesis that psychiatric diagnoses are influenced primarily by situational context rather than by patients’ signs and symptoms.

Does Rosenhan’s study support or challenge the issues of reliability and validity around diagnosing SZ?

Essentially Rosenhan’s research showed that psychiatrists cannot reliably tell the difference between an insane and sane person, calling into question the reliability of a schizophrenia diagnosis. This suggests the validity of psychiatric diagnoses was low and the DSM was flawed.

What is the aim of the experiment in on being sane in an insane place?

“On Being Sane in Insane Places” was the result of a study in which eight people without mental illness got themselves admitted to psychiatric institutions — Rosenhan wanted to see whether mental health professionals could actually distinguish between psychologically well people and those with mental illnesses.

Is Rosenhan’s study an indictment of psychology?

Rosenhan’s 1973 study was a powerful indictment of psychiatry of the early 1970s. It is a classic study relevant to discussions of contending definitions of abnormality and the validity and reliability of diagnosis.

What was the main point in Rosenhan’s article on being sane in insane places and why is this important?

How many Pseudopatients were in Rosenhan’s study?

eight
For the study, eight “pseudopatients” – Rosenhan himself and seven volunteers – presented themselves at institutions across the country with the same symptoms: they reported hearing voices that said, “thud, empty, hollow.” Beyond a few biographical adjustments for privacy reasons, the pseudopatients used their own life …

What is the Rosenhan experiment in psychology?

The Rosenhan experiment or Thud experiment was an experiment conducted to determine the reliability and validity of psychiatric diagnosis. The experimenters feigned hallucinations to enter psychiatric hospitals, and acted normally afterwards. They were diagnosed with psychiatric disorders and were given antipsychotic drugs.

Which study was carried out by David Rosenhan?

This study was carried out by David Rosenhan. It is a famous naturalistic observation with aspects of a field experiment included. The Rosenhan experiment or Thud experiment was an experiment conducted to determine the reliability and validity of psychiatric diagnosis.

When was Rosenhan’s study on Insanity published?

The study was conducted by psychologist David Rosenhan, a Stanford University professor, and published by the journal Science in 1973 under the title “On being sane in insane places”. It is considered an important and influential criticism of psychiatric diagnosis, and broached the topic of wrongful involuntary commitment.

Is Rosenhan’s study detrimental to mental health experts’ reputation?

As suggested by Kety (1975), The expert’s job is to diagnose; they do not expect an ‘actor’ as such to test them, therefore in my opinion Rosenhan’s study cannot be seen as detrimental to mental health experts’ reputation, rather the vicious, yet inevitable effect of expectations and labelling.