Is there any photo of Max Stirner?

There are no photos of Max Stirner. It should be one of the first things you learn about him, because his likeness as rendered by Friedrich Engels many years later is the closest thing we have.

Who drew the picture of Max Stirner?

The most-often reproduced portrait of Stirner is a cartoon by Engels, drawn forty years later from memory at biographer Mackay’s request.

Did Stirner exist?

Max Stirner, pseudonym of Johann Kaspar Schmidt, (born October 25, 1806, Bayreuth, Bavaria [Germany]—died June 26, 1856, Berlin, Prussia), German antistatist philosopher in whose writings many anarchists of the late 19th and the 20th centuries found ideological inspiration.

Was Nietzsche influenced by Stirner?

By the turn of the century, the belief that Nietzsche had been influenced by Stirner was so widespread that it became something of a commonplace, at least in Germany, prompting one observer to note in 1907 that “Stirner’s influence in modern Germany has assumed astonishing proportions, and moves in general parallel …

Why is there no photo of Max Stirner?

He died in 1856, which was before photography became very common, so it’s unlikely there is a photographic portrait.

Is Engels a stirner?

Engels was probably the first to identify Stirner as an anarchist, at the very least his claim was very influential in popularizing this identification.

Is Engels a Stirner?

Is Stirner an Engel?

Stirner was first identified as an anarchist in Friedrich Engels’ Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy, a classi- fication that was adopted by the earliest scholarly studies of anarchism, E.V.

What are spooks stirner?

Stirner does use the word “spooks” or “ghosts” (depending on translation) to describe what is more typically described as “fixed ideas.” Pretty much any idea can be turned into a “spook”, an idea that haunts or possesses you and ostensibly motivates your actions above all else.

Did Nietzsche plagiarize?

In his maturity he often “plagiarized” — the Bible, Schopenhauer, Hölderlin, and, frequently, and inaccurately, himself. But to speak of plagiarism here is anachronistic.

What Stirner says is a word?

The creative nothing by its dialectical shortcomings creates the need for a description, for meaning: What Stirner says is a word, a thought, a concept; what he means is no word, no thought, no concept. What he says is not what is meant, and what he means is unsayable. — Max Stirner, Stirner’s Critics.

Is this the only firsthand photo of Max Stirner?

It is highly likely that this and the group sketch of Die Freien at Hippel’s are the only firsthand images of Stirner.

Was Max Stirner a member of the club of Vienna?

It does not appear that Stirner contributed much to the discussions, but he was a faithful member of the club and an attentive listener. The most-often reproduced portrait of Stirner is a cartoon by Engels, drawn forty years later from memory at biographer Mackay’s request.

What are some of the most important critics of Max Stirner?

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Later, Marx and Engels wrote a major criticism of Stirner’s work. The number of pages Marx and Engels devote to attacking Stirner in (the unexpurgated text of) The German Ideology, in which they derided him as Sankt Max (“Saint Max”), exceeds the total of Stirner’s written works.

What did Max Stirner do after the ego and its own?

After The Ego and Its Own, Stirner wrote Stirner’s Critics and translated Adam Smith ‘s The Wealth of Nations and Jean-Baptiste Say ‘s Traite d’Economie Politique into German to little financial gain. He also wrote a compilation of texts titled History of Reaction in 1852.