What are the responsibilities of a reviewer?

They provide feedback on the paper, suggest improvements and make a recommendation to the editor about whether to accept, reject or request changes to the article. The ultimate decision always rests with the editor but reviewers play a significant role in determining the outcome.

What is the ethical responsibilities of a reviewer?

These responsibilities include the unbiased selection of reviewers, the assurance to the author that the peer review process will be done in a fair and timely fashion, and that the final decision regarding acceptance or publication will be based on the scientific validity of the information in the manuscript.

What are the responsibilities of a reviewer to preserve the confidentiality of work under review?

The reviewers are expected to maintain absolute confidentiality with regard to the contents of manuscripts. The reviews are to be conducted objectively and the reviewers are expected to express their views clearly with supporting reasons.

What are the duties of reviewer of a manuscript?

Reviewers are primarily employed to go through the research papers submitted by the authors for publishing. Their prime object is to find discrepancies in those papers. They give their valuable opinions in an article. They have to assess the manuscripts thoroughly.

Which of the following statements is true regarding the responsibilities of a reviewer?

Which of the following statements is true regarding the responsibilities of a reviewer? A reviewer’s conflict of interest should be disclosed to the journal editor or grant agency. Reviewers have a responsibility to promote ethical peer review by: Preserving the confidentiality of the submission.

What is an educator reviewer?

Education Advisers and Reviewers conduct educational research, develop course curricula and associated teaching materials for use by educational institutions, and review and examine the work of teachers and the results from curriculum programs in school settings.

Who can be a reviewer?

There are no specific qualifications needed to be a reviewer, but most reviewers will have a PhD. You certainly need to be able to prove you know the field of study well enough to be able to assess the novelty, quality, impact and importance of the research.

How do you respond to an academic review?

Responding to reviewers’ comments

1. Begin by thanking the reviewer for taking the time to assess your manuscript.
2. Then, specify that you’ve addressed all the concerns they raised.
3. List all the reviewer’s comments and your answer to each one.
4. Avoid giving yes or no answers.

Which statement best describes what an IRB is responsible for reviewing?

Terms in this set (7) – FDA states that IRB has the authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove research. This group review serves an important role in the protection of the rights and welfare of human research subjects.

What is the primary purpose of peer review?

Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. Its ultimate purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor quality articles.

How reliable is EdReports?

EdReports claims to be the trustworthy experts. They hire teachers to work in small groups for the purpose of examining every bit of a curriculum with a fine toothed comb. Evaluations are based on how closely the curriculum follows the Common Core Standards, text quality, building knowledge, and usability.

What is an education advisor?

An education advisor is a consultant or academic counselor for college students or students who are entering college. As an advisor, you may help students explore different majors, discuss their career path, choose classes and complete the enrollment process.

What is the reviewer’s responsibility?

Reviewers are responsible for acting promptly, adhering to the instructions for completing a review, and submitting it in a timely manner. Failure to do so undermines the review process. Every effort should be made to complete the review within the time requested.

What is the difference between a reviewer and an approver?

In my Pharmaceutical experience, I have seen that “Reviewers” are ususally lower in Management cadres while “Approvers” are higher in Management cadre. Click to expand… Makes perfect sense …. similar to the prefilter and then the final filter before delivery.

What are the characteristics of a good A reviewer?

A reviewer should respect the intellectual independence of the author. Although reviews are confidential, all anonymous comments should be courteous and capable of withstanding public scrutiny. Some journals ask reviewers to provide two sets of comments: one for the author and the other for the editor only.

What questions should A reviewer ask the editor?

If a reviewer is unsure about the policies for enlisting the help of others in the review process, he or she should ask the editor. Constructive critique. Reviewer comments should acknowledge the positive aspects of the material under review, identify negative aspects constructively, and indicate the improvements needed.